Copenhagen Protest Update

•December 14, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Crikey reports that approximately 200 more protesters were arrested by Copenhagen Police today, bringing the total of arrests to around 1500.

In today’s “Hit the Production” rally, activists had hoped to shut down Copenhagen Harbour to protest the international shipping industry’s role in causing climate change. However, yet again, the Copenhagen Police seemed determined to shut down any form of protest.

“It seems totally unprovoked,” Richard Bernard of Climate Justice Action, an activist group opposed to market-based solutions to climate change, said. “There were no meaningful acts of disobedience. Police are shutting them [the protests] down before they’ve even had a chance to have their say. It´s a human rights issue, a freedom of speech issue.”

Only two of the 968 protestors detained prior to now have been charged with any offence. Thirteen remain in custody awaiting an outcome. The arrests of the past few days have been made under a special COP15 “pre-emptive” measures that allows police to detain anyone they suspect to be a trouble maker.

Wednesday in the next big day of action at Copenhagen – protestors plan to try and storm the climate summit, so watch out for another overreaction by Copenhagen Police.

Finally, have a look a the cages protestors are being detained in. Dehumanising much?

100,000 protest at Copenhagen, police respond with terror tactics

•December 13, 2009 • Leave a Comment

The Copenhagen Climate Conference finally came alive when up to 100,000 protesters participated in the largest climate protest in history. Calling for an effective and legally binding climate agreement that would limit global warming to 1.5 degrees and secure the welfare of billions, the protest seemed to bring out new heights of creative direct action in protesters from across the world.

“Copenhagen is in the eye of the storm. Each year 300,000 people are dying because of climate change. This is not about adaptation, it is about survival,” Kumi Naidoo, executive director of Greenpeace International, said in a speech.

“We want to remind you that they marched in Berlin and the wall fell. They marched in Cape Town and apartheid fell. They marched in Copenhagen and we are going to get a real deal,” Archbishop Tutu told a vigil of protesters.

However, as usual, both the mass media and police have been engaged in demonising and, in the case of the Danish Police, dehumanising protesters. With George Bush-style tactics, the Danish authorities pre-emptively arrested approximately 900 protesters, on the suspicion of smashing windows. GET REAL. If there had been 900 protesters smashing windows, we would know about it! Two Britons were also deported from Denmark – one for vandalism and one for spitting on a police officer. Hmmm, that must have been a pretty powerful gob of spit to warrant forcibly removing someone from a country. Just saying…

Some protesters managed to retain a sharp sense of humour in spite of police tactics, with a British demonstrator, Georgy Forshall, telling the mainstream media: “Two of my friends are in there. The police said demonstrators had been throwing stones, but my friends were in a cow costume, they wouldn’t have been able, physically, to throw stones.”

Protesters were also arrested during the protest, when police kettled a group of protesters, including some members of the anarchist Black Bloc. Simon Sheikh, national director of the progressive Australian lobby group Get Up, watched the crackdown from his apartment. “At a preplanned time they ran with full riot gear straight at women, children and families. We were taken aback.” Mr Sheikh said the police presence had been building up in Christianshavn all day. When the police moved on the marchers, they separated out a group of about 350, pushing some into shopfronts. Some marchers were thrown to the ground.

Henri Purje, who was in Copenhagen with Attac, a group opposed to international free trade, was standing in front of the group that was penned in and taken away by police. “I was in the last line of people before the police suddenly moved in for no obvious reason. It seemed as if they just wanted to take out a bunch of random people. No one was being violent, I didn’t see anyone doing anything apart from singing and chanting and marching. Everything had been really peaceful,” Purje said.

Helga Matthiassen, who was detained for an hour before being released due to an injury she had recently sustained, said, “Of course we’re angry – people all over the world are angry about being lied to by governments who are making a corporate deal at the climate talks, and now when we try to protest against this on the streets we are randomly held by police.

 “Not only have we been denied the right to protest, but our basic human rights have also been ignored in this ludicrous, staged police exercise.  It seems Danish Police have a new motto: why just criminalise protesters, when you can dehumanise them too?”

Those people kettled by the police in the road were reported to have been particular victims of police terror tactics. Approximately 200-350 people were held on the road in extremely cold weather, cuffed and forced into seated positions in lines for between 3 and 5 hours. Bring back any memories of the stress positions used by US authorities? Protesters expressed severe physical discomfort and had no access to water, medical attention or toilet facilities. Many activists are reported to have urinated themselves and several are reported to have fainted while detained on the ground. See these photos for the visuals:

Henrik Suhr from Copenhagen police publicly admitted that protesters (both from the 900 pre-emptively arrested and from those arrested later) were being detained in “some sort of cages”, with conditions described by protesters as “just less than horrific”. Cages were reportedly overcrowded, with police handcuffing people to benches in the corridor because of lack of space. Some people reportedly spent 5 hours handcuffed to benches without food or water. Access to toilet facilities, food and water was also allegedly denied by Danish police.

Now, I would like to add a little reminder to members of the mainstream media. It seems that few people are able to comprehend the meaning of the word violence, when it is pertaining to the tactics of demonstrators. Smashing windows IS NOT violence. Letting off fireworks (when no-one is harmed) IS NOT violence. Police allege that bricks were thrown, but as there have been no reports of any injured police men or women NO VIOLENCE has yet to be documented, except by members of the police, as reports of a woman with a broken arm have suggested.

This video provides a good look around the protest, although the reporter fails in terms of my above reminder, sigh.

In terms of the conference, inaction still seems the likely consequence, but there are some positive signs. On Friday, delegates released a document that proposed tougher global targets than had been previously suggested. Collectively, states would reduce their output of greenhouse gases by between 25% and 45% by 2020 compared with 1990 levels. During that time, major developing countries would reduce theirs by between 15% and 30%. Together, all countries would cut emissions between 50% and 95% by 2050. Whether this document is adopted in a legally-binding agreement remains to be seen, however. The text also fails to indicate how much money rich countries would give poor ones to cope with global warming, a major bone of contention.

Anyway, enjoy the rest of these pictures. Hopefully, with spirit like this, inaction will not be an option for politicians who want to stay in power and we can shape a new political system to meet the demands of the future.

Some quotes…

•December 10, 2009 • Leave a Comment

“I myself have never been able to find out precisely what feminism is: I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat.” – Rebecca West

“To be truly radical is to make hope possible rather than despair convincing.” – Raymond Williams.

“I ask no favors for my sex… All I ask of our brethren is that they will take their feet from off our necks.” – Sarah Moore Grimke.

“Because I am a woman, I must make unusual efforts to succeed. If I fail, no one will say, ‘She doesn’t have what it takes.’ They will say, ‘Women don’t have what it takes.’” – Clare Boothe Luce.

Bernadette Devlin

•December 8, 2009 • Leave a Comment

When I was travelling through Ireland – and loving every minute of it! – I was fascinated by Ireland’s political history, which often left me fuming at the injustices that were perpetrated by the British state. What infuriates me the most is that people assume that Britain has improved – that Ireland’s history is just a blot of the UK’s otherwise clean slate that should be glanced at and quickly forgotten. I was really pleased to see that the Free Derry museum had been opened my Mozzam Begg – an ex-Guantanamo Bay detainee. Apparently the similarities in the torture methods used on Mozzam and those used on IRA prisoners in British-run prisons were frightening. What this trip has left me with is a sense that all struggles are one. Whether it be the fight for Irish Independence, or the struggle for the recognition of a Palestinian State, or the struggles of oppressed minorities across the world for equal rights – in all cases a group of people are told that they are worthless and that they deserve less than others. And in all cases people rise up and demand their rights. I just wish so many amazing people did not die in this process.

Anyway, to the subject of my post. I’ve decided to start a new category – “amazing women throughout history”, because the more I learn about this world, the more I am struck by some of the incredible women who have shaped history and perhaps gained less recognition than their male counterparts. So read on and be amazed by the wonderful Bernadette Devlin – in her own words “I am a feminist a socialist and a republican.”

Bernadette Devlin 

Josephine Bernadette Devlin McAliskey was born on 23 April 1947, in County Tyrone, Northern Ireland. 

Devlin studied Psychology at Queen’s University in Belfast in 1968 where she was a prominent member of the radical student-led civil rights political party called the People’s Democracy – which led to her expulsion from university. 

A civil rights march in Derry on 5 October 1968 was “the beginning of it all. I can still see, in my mind, the absolute hatred on the faces of police officers. My understanding of the society I was in was irrevocably changed.” It had been organised by the newly formed Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association, to protest at discrimination against Catholics. “This was a pent-up hatred. This was naked violence. This was three or four men with long cudgels standing over someone on the ground and hitting and hitting them. This was police following those who had dragged away the injured, and beating them up as well. This was a realisation that your worst enemy was in a uniform and had the power to kill you.” 

Devlin then began her venture into the murky world of Westminster politics. She opposed James Chichester-Clark in the Northern Ireland general election of 1969. When George Forrest, the MP for Mid Ulster, died, she fought the subsequent by-election on the “Unity” ticket, defeating a female Unionist candidate, Forrest’s widow Anna, and was elected to the Westminster Parliament. By this point Devlin was still only 21 and became the youngest MP ever to serve in the British parliament and the constituency of Mid-Ulster received a record voter turnout of 91.5%. 

Bernadette, however, took an anarchist-style perspective to her role as a politician, saying “basically, I have no place in organized politics. By coming to the British Parliament, I’ve allowed the people to sacrifice me at the top and let go the more effective job I should be doing at the bottom.” 

Devlin was part of the “Battle of the Bogside,” which occurred after the Protestant and Unionist Apprentice Boys’ Parade in Derry on August 12, 1969. The riot involved taking control of the Bogside (traditionally working class and Catholic area of Derry) and erecting barricades to exclude a police force of decided bias from the area. Devlin was a central figure in urging the construction of the barricades and encouraging their defenders. 

Bernadette made her maiden speech in Westminster on her 22nd birthday, rather unconventionally within an hour of taking her seat. Here’s an excerpt in which she is replying to the Member for Londonderry (Mr. Chichester Clark): 

“I had never hoped to see the day when I might agree with someone who represents the bigoted and sectarian Unionist Party, which uses a deliberate policy of dividing the people in order to keep the ruling minority in power and to keep the oppressed people of Ulster oppressed. I never thought I could see the day when I should agree with any phrase uttered by the representative of such a party, but the Hon. Gentleman summed up the situation ‘to a t.’ He referred to stark, human misery. That is what I saw in Bogside. It has been there for fifty years – and that same stark human misery is to be found in the Protestant Fountain area, which the Hon. Gentleman would claim to represent.” 

After the Battle of Bogside, Bernadette travelled to the United States and met with the Secretary General of the United Nations. She was given the keys to the city of New York — and handed them over to the Black Panther Party. 

“I was not very long there until, like water, I found my own level.  ’My people’ — the people who know about oppression, discrimination, prejudice, poverty and the frustration and despair that they produce — were not Irish Americans. They were black, Puerto Rican, Chicano. And those who were supposed to be ‘my people’, the Irish Americans who know about English misrule and the Famine and supported the civil-rights movement at home, and knew that Partition and England were the cause of the problem, looked and sounded to me like Orangemen. They said exactly the same things about blacks that the loyalists said about us at home. In New York, I was given the key to the city by the mayor, an honour not to be sneezed at. I gave it to the Black Panthers.” 

On her return to Ireland, in December 1969, Bernadette was convicted of incitement to riot in the Battle of Bogside and she served a short jail term after being re-elected to government. 

Bernadette witnessed the events of the Bloody Sunday Massacre, at which twenty-seven civil rights protesters were shot by the British Army Parachute Regiment during a Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association march. Thirteen people, seven of whom were teenagers, died immediately, while the death of another person 4½ months later has been attributed to the injuries he received on the day. The massacre began just as Bernadette began to speak to the rally. 

In the aftermath of the event, Devlin was repeatedly denied the chance to speak in Parliament, although parliamentary convention decreed that any MP witnessing an incident under discussion would be granted an opportunity to speak about it in Parliament. When State Secretary for the Home Department, Reginald Maudling, made a statement to Parliament on Bloody Sunday saying that the British Army had fired only in self-defence, Bernadette furiously punched him in the face, yelling “Murderous hypocrite!” As she later wryly remarked, “It wasn’t long before people discovered the final horrors of letting an urchin into Parliament.” 

Bernadette’s prominent role is politics certainly ruffled some feathers. “People here said, ‘Confine yourself to our issues. And please cut your hair and lengthen your skirt. And don’t smoke.’”  Protestants were critical of her and referred to her as a “Fidel Castro in a miniskirt.” In 1971, while still unmarried, she gave birth to a daughter Róisin. She married Michael McAliskey in April 1973 and lost her seat in Parliament in 1974. They were among the founders of the Irish Republican Socialist Party in 1974. 

Bernadette recalls that this point “was when the civil rights movement ended and the armed struggle began. That was the point of realisation for me that the penalty for demanding equal rights in your society was that your government would kill you. Then you say, ‘If it’s OK for the government to declare war on the people, the people have a right to declare war on the government.’” 

She stood as an independent candidate in support of the prisoners on the blanket protest and dirty protest at Long Kesh prison in the 1979 elections to the European Parliament in Northern Ireland, and won 5.9% of the vote. She was a leading spokesperson for the Smash H-Block Campaign, which supported the 1981 Irish Hunger Strike in 1980 and 1981, though she remained critical of Gerry Adams and other Sinn Féin leaders. 

On 16 January 1981, she and her husband were shot by Ulster Freedom Fighters paramilitaries who broke into their remote County Tyrone home. British soldiers were watching the McAliskey home at the time, but failed to prevent the assassination attempt – whether by choice or accident is unknown. Michael was shot twice. She was hit in the chest, arm and thigh as she went to wake up one of the three children. 

In more recent years, when there has been relative peace in Northern Ireland Bernadette has been a powerful, if private, force in various social issues. In 1997 she helped found the South Tyrone Empowerment Programme (Step), the network of groups and campaigners she directs from Dungannon, which currently focuses on improving the lives of migrant workers. “We don’t confine ourselves to one area, such as housing, or legal rights, or water charges – we research and campaign across them all.” 

“People have said, ‘You were with us; now you’re with the foreigners.’ I say, ‘No. I am doing the same thing I have always done. It’s still about people having a right to fulfil their potential and not be excluded from that because of other people’s prejudice.’” 

“I think there are two perceptions – the perception of me from the outside which sees the north of Ireland as ‘them’ and ‘us’, Catholics and Protestants, and me therefore as part of one side. And then there is the perception here, on the inside, which is more complex and sees me not as Catholic, but rather as a socialist, a feminist and someone who has had nothing to do with the Catholic Church for 30 years except to criticise it. I’m therefore an outsider and I don’t think it is any accident that I have found myself working with people on the margins.” 

In 2003, she was barred from entering the United States and deported on the grounds that the State Department had declared that she “poses a serious threat to the security of the United States”, although she protested that she had no terrorist involvement — hinging ostensibly on her conviction for incitement to riot in 1969 — but had been permitted to frequently travel to the United States in the past. 

“When I was younger, the anger was all from the heart up. It came from my heart and it came out of my mouth. The anger has not gone away. Anger is deep-seated. It’s not all right. But it’s not personalised anger. People ask me about the things they think are most important. And I say – which is what I feel – Bloody Sunday was not by any stretch of the imagination the worst thing that happened to me. It was the worst thing that happened to others – the families in Derry, for instance. If you say, ‘What is the worst thing that happened to me?’ then 1969 to 1999 is the worst thing that happened to me and lots of other people who lived through that period. Thirty years of my life is the worst thing that happened to me. And that doesn’t get better.”

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernadette_Devlin_McAliskey

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/bernadette-mcaliskey-return-of-the-roaring-girl-951825.html

Joss Whedon rocks my socks

•November 30, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Here is yet another reason why I love Buffy The Vampire Slayer and Joss Whedon… Enjoy!

Incoming alert: men face human rights abuses in Melbourne

•November 19, 2009 • 1 Comment

If you happen to read this, I love you Clem Bastow. Everyone MUST read this article examining the reasons for the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal’s decision to ban the creation of a women-only tour group. And they say feminists don’t have a sense of humour….

Don’t men suffer enough discrimination without beig banned from tours?

What do blood diamonds, human trafficking, and women-only holiday tours have in common? As of today, they all represent an affront to human rights. And, most worryingly of all, the latter is happening right here in Melbourne.

Hard to believe, but here’s where it all began: this year, former tour-guide Erin Maitland decided she’d like to set up a travel business that provided female-only holiday tours; she decided to call it Travel Sisters. She had heard from women who were tired of being hit on during boozy package tours, and recognised that some women also did not want to, or could not, mix with men while on holiday, perhaps due to religious beliefs, or through having been victims of sexual or domestic violence. So, a month or so ago, she applied to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal for an exemption from anti-discrimination laws.

VCAT vice-president Judge Marilyn Harbison said that Maitland was welcome to reapply to VCAT if she could come up with ”credible evidence based on charter considerations” that her women-only travel service deserved an exemption from anti-discrimination laws, because at this stage the business ”cannot presently be justified on human rights principles”. Judge Harbison speaks of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights And Responsibilities. On the principle of equality, the charter states: ”Some groups or individuals, such as people with a disability or members of minority groups may be disadvantaged by discrimination they experience.”

I was unaware that men – especially the white, straight, middle-class ones who were quick to offer online applause about VCAT’s decision – were particularly disadvantaged by discrimination they experience, but I thank Judge Harbison for enlightening me.

It’s no wonder Judge Harbison came to the decision she did, really: Melbourne men are particularly vocal on the topic of their (human) rights.

Women-only events? If you listen to certain corners of the male population, that’s about as bad as genocide. Don’t mention Fernwood Fitness and, for God’s sake, don’t bring up Reclaim The Night at your next dinner party if you know what’s good for you.

You see, Melbourne men are deeply disadvantaged by discrimination. They sit in the cold, unforgiving innards of the Melbourne Club (and the Australia Club, and the Athenaeum Club, and the Savage Club) and lament their lowly place in society. They sob into their cucumber point sandwiches, ”Why? Why won’t the women let us come on their holidays or show off our mad biceps alongside them at the gym?”

I hear – on good authority – that there are wait staff employed specifically to ease the existential woes of club members for this very reason; they bring around silk handkerchiefs and dispatch soothing words to men broken down by years of systematic discrimination.

In fact, men would probably be able to offer more of their own time to eradicating human rights abuses worldwide – female genital mutilation, perhaps, or maybe honour killings – if they weren’t so busy fighting for their own rights. It’s understandable, really; what good are they to us if they haven’t got their own rights in order first?

Day in, day out, men are working tirelessly to ensure that they continue to enjoy the human rights they so deserve: the right to be paid more than their female counterparts, for example.

It takes a lot of time and energy to do all that work, about the same time and energy as a woman, actually – so the least we can do is pay them a bit more in order that they don’t feel, well, like girls.

With all this in mind, it’s understandable that Judge Harbison decided to rule against an exemption for Travel Sisters. What with all the work men do supporting women’s rights, being kicked off a holiday would be the final insult.

So, let me be the first to say to these women – the ones whose religion prevents them from engaging in mixed recreational activities, who prefer not to be groped by drunken hooligans or who desire a women-only space within which to allow the emotional scars caused by domestic violence to heal – to shut up and stop whingeing.

After all, here in Victoria we are lucky to enjoy basic human rights such as freedom, justice, peace and respect, and package tours.

Clem Bastow is a Melbourne writer and broadcaster,

Hero of the feminist world – MS PACMAN

•November 19, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Speaking of great Youtube videos (which we weren’t), this is probably my favourite of all time!

Homophobia and the media’s love of the ‘lesbian kiss’

•November 18, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Has anyone ever wondered why women in the media are allowed brief flirtations with lesbians (providing they are a very brief interludes to returning to ‘normal’ heterosexuality), but men experimenting with their sexualities is never depicted? Also, can anyone tell me why so many straight cis-gendered men I have met are defensive/antagonistic/openly scared of homosexuality in men? I can imagine that some would see people who do not conform to conventional masculinity as threatening their sense of being (I am a man, hear me roar), but also a part of me wonders whether there is an element of a fear of sexual assault. Women grow up with the knowledge that they are always at risk of sexual assault by a man who may be physically stronger than them, but this idea would be foreign to many men. This in no way excuses homophobic responses, but it is interesting to ponder what is going on inside the minds of homophobic people when, to me, their prejudice seems utter madness.

Have a look at this wonderful video by Brian Safi, analysing the ‘lesbian kiss’ media phenomenon.

Indonesian police shoot two asylum seekers

•November 16, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Check out this article by Pamela Curr of the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre on the latest Australian government-sanctioned mistreatment of asylum seekers:

Yesterday two Afghan asylum seekers were shot by Indonesian forces as their boat was stopped. It is being reported that they were shot whilst trying to escape. They were on the high seas in international waters at the time. Escape – where? Today all phones in the Macassar Immigration prison are responding “disconnected”. Even phones which are never turned off and whose owners were not on the boat. However a text message from a 17 year old Afghan boy who was on the boat tells us what happened.

SMS 8PM Saturday My Name is Axxxx son of Mxxxx 17years. This not my mistake to get on boat- its unhcr who make me- Y (Why) they announce my refugee status they promised that the complete process wont take more than six months but now its one year-i got no result- i cant tolerate anymore in detention centre. Then finally i came with 61 people on boat after 5 nites we got on international water -they intercepted us- then they request 4 bribe -we gave them 50,000$ – after some minutes another boat came to stop us – we didnt-then they start shoting- after one hour conflict two of us got bollet injury – right now they r n hospital- dont know wether they r alive or no

The Indonesia police and miliatry have not previously resorted to force against asylum seekers. The shooting of two asylum seekers is a dangerous and frightening escalation. It comes on the back of increased pressure from the Australian government to stop the boats. The Howard government used cannon fire over the bows of boats to frighten asylum seekers. The Australian navy broadsided boats and fired repeated vollies over their bows but did not actually shoot at them.

The Indonesian solution is imploding. It has been in place for over 8 years now through two Australian governments. There is now a grave risk that people will die as the Indonesian military feel increasing pressure from their political masters in Jakarta and Canberra to stop the boats.

Last year Australia resettled 35 people from Indonesia. Currently there are 560 Card Carrying refugees, assessed by UNHCR who have no place to call home. They are sitting and waiting for Australia to open the door. Most have family members here waiting to welcome them and embrace them back into their family. There are a further nearly 1400 people registered with UNHCR whose claims are not being processed becasue there is nowhere for them to go. These people have fled horrific violence, seen family members killed and some are unaccompanied children. Next week consultations begin on resettlement intake for next year. We urgently need 2000 places allocated to the refugees being warehoused in Indonesia. This will stop the boats more decently and surely than shooting them.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

Via Viola Wilkins

Rape culture and victim blaming

•November 3, 2009 • 2 Comments

Lately we have heard two horrific stories about gang rape – one in California and one closer to home (for me) on Phillip Island, Australia.

In Richmond, California a 15-year-old girl was gang-raped for more than two hours during a high school homecoming dance earlier this week. Police suspect that 10 men attacked the girl, who was on her way to be picked up from the dance by her parent. One of the most sickening things is not only was the girl raped by 10 men, but there were at least 10 other witnesses to the crime who watched and did nothing. No-one present at the rape called the police. The police arrived two and a half hours after the rape began – after a person who heard of the rape second-hand called 911.

“This just gets worse and worse the more you dig into it,” [Lt. Mark Gagan of the Richmond, CA police department] said. “It was like a horror movie after looking at the evidence. I can’t believe not one person felt compelled to help her.”

Unfortunately, stories like this should be all too familiar to those who keep an eye on the news. While this story has attracted a lot of coverage, because of its brutality and the number of participants, sexual violence has become such a common occurrence in many Western states that it barely rates a mention any more.

1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime. 1 out of every 5 Australian women have experienced sexual violence since the age of 15. Overall 45% of Australian women sexually assaulted since the age of 15 had been victims of more than one sexual assault (ABS Women’s Safety Survey, 1996).

Already, rape apologists have been spilling onto the internet to begin the victim-blaming that will no doubt form part of the defence’s arguments. See these internet comments:

“shes 15 and drinking outside on a bench by herself in a dress…. if your not gunna be smart about the choices you make, im not gunna feel bad for what happens.

“I’m a 15 year old girl in New York, and I’m sorry to say this, but isn’t it possible that witnesses saw her get drunk with alcohal and belived she willingly participated as an effect? I’m sorry, but she shouldn’t have drunk alcohal to begin with. I’m not saying she deserved it, but she should’ve been much, much wiser.”

So far, the girl’s school has promised to “hold a safety meeting for parents and students Wednesday evening to address the assault”. But, as Shaker commenter ClioBluestocking points out: “This girl wasn’t brutalized because she wasn’t practicing good ’safety’ techniques. She was brutalized because at least 20 young men thought rape was a sport. The school should be having meetings with parents about that: how not to raise misogynists, rapists and rape apologists.”

The second rape happened on October 10 Phillip Island in Australia – about half an hour from where I grew up. Two young women were taken away from a party, locked in separate rooms and at least one of the girls has alleged rape. Sixteen men, aged between 17 and 20, have been interviewed by police in relation to the crime. The men were participating in an end of season football trip.

There is victim-blaming galore with this case too. According to The Age, more than 700 people have joined a Facebook page supporting two of the perpetrators. One of the comments: ”Oh I feel for them . . people can be so judgmental. So not fair. Makes me sick too. I only hope that when it is all over, the boys can move on.”

Now obviously, both these cases have yet to go before court, so the men involved have a presumption of innocence for now. But unfortunately, too often the court system betrays victims of sexual assault. In the UK, for example, the government estimates that as many as 95% of rapes are never reported to the police at all. Of the rapes that were reported from 2007 to 2008, only 6.5% resulted in a conviction, compared with 34% of criminal cases in general.

Many people have expressed shock at these attacks, but, in general, few link them to the wider societal problem of the rape culture that is endemic in many societies. These men should bear full personal responsibility for their actions, but these attacks also happen in a society which normalises violence against women. See this definition of rape culture:

A rape culture is a complex of beliefs that encourages male sexual aggression and supports violence against women. It is a society where violence is seen as sexy and sexuality as violent. In a rape culture, women perceive a continuum of threatened violence that ranges from sexual remarks to sexual touching to rape itself. A rape culture condones physical and emotional terrorism against women as the norm. In a rape culture both men and women assume that sexual violence is a fact of life, inevitable as death or taxes. This violence, however, is neither biologically nor divinely ordained. Much of what we accept as inevitable is in fact the expression of values and attitudes that can change.

So to combat the inevitable inaction ’safety’ messages that will accompany these attacks (which place the onus on women to protect themselves, rather than society and men in general to prevent the attacks from happening in the first place), see this list of handy hints for would-be attackers:

  • Men should stay in their houses, and lock their doors
  • Men should not walk alone late at night, and should stay in populated areas where they can be seen
  • Men should stay in groups of people they trust to not let them walk off alone
  • Men should refrain from telling or laughing at sexist jokes, perpetrating violence against women
  • Men should refrain from attending parties and drinking
  • Men should refrain from intimidating women
  • Men should refrain from following women
  • Men should refrain from putting drugs in women’s drinks
  • MEN SHOULD STOP SEXUALLY ASSAULTING WOMEN